<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed
    xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
    xmlns:at="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/at"
    xmlns:icbm="http://postneo.com/icbm"
    xmlns:rvw="http://purl.org/NET/RVW/0.2/"
    xml:lang="en">
    <title>in my world...</title>
    <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" title="in my world... (Atom)" href="http://asuh.vox.com/library/posts/page/1/atom.xml" />
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" title="in my world..." href="http://asuh.vox.com/library/posts/page/1/"/> 
    <link rel="service.post" type="application/atom+xml" title="in my world..." href="http://www.vox.com/services/atom/svc=post/collection_id=6a00cdf3a85ed0cb8f00d09e471080be2b" /> 
    <link rel="service.subscribe" type="application/atom+xml" title="in my world..." href="http://asuh.vox.com/library/posts/atom.xml" />   
    <link rel="last" type="application/atom+xml" title="in my world..." href="http://asuh.vox.com/library/posts/page/1/atom.xml" />  
    <generator uri="http://www.vox.com/">Vox</generator>
    <updated>2007-01-06T08:55:26Z</updated> 
    <author>
        <name>Micah</name>
        <uri>http://asuh.vox.com/?_c=feed-atom-full</uri>
    </author> 
    <id>tag:vox.com,2006:6p00cdf3a85ed0cb8f/</id>  
    
    <entry>
        <title>OS X Annoyances</title>   
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" title="OS X Annoyances" href="http://asuh.vox.com/library/post/os-x-annoyances.html?_c=feed-atom-full" />  
        <link rel="service.post" type="application/atom+xml" title="OS X Annoyances" href="http://asuh.vox.com/library/post/os-x-annoyances.html?_c=feed-atom-full#comments" /> 
        <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" title="OS X Annoyances" href="http://www.vox.com/atom/svc=post/asset_id=6a00cdf3a85ed0cb8f00d09e4b25f4be2b" />          <id>tag:vox.com,2007-01-06:asset-6a00cdf3a85ed0cb8f00d09e4b25f4be2b</id>
        <published>2007-01-06T03:17:47Z</published>
        <updated>2007-01-06T08:55:26Z</updated>
    
        <author>
            <name>Micah</name>
            <uri>http://asuh.vox.com/?_c=feed-atom-full</uri>
        </author>
    
        
        <content type="html" xml:base="http://asuh.vox.com/?_c=feed-atom-full">
            <![CDATA[
                <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:at="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/at">
        <div></div><p>Having spent the majority of my personal computing life on <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/windows/">Windows</a> PCs, I am
now using a <a href="http://www.apple.com/macosx/">Mac
G5</a> at work and my brand new <a href="http://www.apple.com/macbookpro/">Macbook Pro</a> at
home. OS X has <a href="http://www.apple.com/macosx/leopard/spaces.html">many</a>
<a href="http://www.apple.com/macosx/features/64bit/">great</a>
<a href="http://www.apple.com/macosx/features/expose/">features</a>
that I&#39;d love to see in Windows.
</p><p>
Despite OS X&#39;s positives, I still have a lot of problems of quirks and
drawbacks that dissuade me from completely switching.&#160; Here&#39;s my list
of the top OS X problems.
</p>
<ol><br />
<li><p><strong>Focus</strong> - This is the
worst annoyance.&#160; OS X focuses on open applications differently than
Windows and I lose time because I lose focus too easily. (Focus is also
known as <em>interweaving windows</em> or
<em>stacking order</em>.)</p><p>Suppose I&#39;m in
a text editor and want to copy and paste something in a browser window
&quot;behind&quot; the text editor. If I hover my mouse over the browser and try
to interact with it, nothing happens. I can&#39;t perform almost any task
without actually clicking-to-focus on the browser window itself. I lose
time switching programs to perform small
tasks.</p><p>Another example is when I&#39;m in the text editor
and click on a menu item on the side, like in any graphic/audio/video
editor menu.&#160; If my mouse is just millimeters off, I lose focus of the
application, switch to Finder, and have to refocus back to the original
program.&#160; This focusing circus wastes time.</p><p>In
Windows, resize arrows indicate the edge of any window, warning me that
I might focus on another application. With this, I rarely ever have
problems focusing on applications in
Windows.</p><em>Solution: <a href="http://www.atomicbird.com/mondomouse/">MondoMouse</a></em></li><br />
<li><p><strong>Resizing windows</strong> -
Often, when I want to <a href="http://www.xvsxp.com/interface/moveresize.php">resize a
window</a>, I don&#39;t want it full screened.&#160; I just need extra
space on the side.&#160; OS X doesn&#39;t make this easy and <a href="http://www.xvsxp.com/interface/ui_feedback.php">its feedback
is less responsive than Windows</a>.</p><p>You have
two clear choices:&#160; click the plus button (top left side) to
&quot;maximize&quot;, or reposition the window and drag the bottom-right side.&#160;
Why not make all sides of a window resizable?</p><p>Forcing
users to resize windows on one corner is a usability issue especially
if the window is already sitting on the bottom right of the
screen.</p><em>Solution: <a href="http://www.atomicbird.com/mondomouse/">MondoMouse</a></em></li><br />
<li><p><strong>Maximize Windows</strong> -
Full-screen windows are inconsistent from program to program when I
maximize it with the plus button (top left side). Though I don&#39;t always
need it, I want consistency when <a href="http://www.xvsxp.com/interface/max_vs_zoom.php">maximizing the
window</a>.</p><em>Solution: <a href="http://ianhenderson.org/megazoomer.html">MegaZoomer</a></em></li><br />
<li><p><strong>Alt-tab</strong> - I miss the
traditional <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alt-Tab">alt-tab</a>
functionality that Windows provides.&#160; OS X gives you a similar function
called command-tab except that OS X groups all the same software
together in application groups.&#160; Instead of alt-tabbing between
individual windows, you command-tab between the groups.&#160; When switching
into Firefox from iTunes, I can&#39;t alternate into the Firefox window I
want.&#160; Rather, I have to command-tab into the group of Firefox windows,
then use <a href="http://www.xvsxp.com/interface/openwindows.php">Exposè
to focus on the desired
window</a>.</p><p>Occasionally when I&#39;m using
command-tab, the mouse hovers over other application groups in the
menu, focusing on another group that I didn&#39;t
intend.</p><p>What OS X introduced in Panther was a
graphical navigation for open windows called <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Expos%C3%A9_%28Mac_OS_X%29">Exposè</a>,
controlled by F9, F10, and F11.&#160; Exposè&#39;s shortcoming is the
random nature of displaying open windows, which is confusing if you&#39;re
working with many open windows with different
sizes.</p><p>Lastly, command-tab might quickly cycle
through application groups, but why does it not cycle into minimized
apps?</p><em>Solution: Command-` to cycle through
individual windows in an application group, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Expos%C3%A9_%28Mac_OS_X%29">Exposè</a>
for a graphical version, <a href="http://www.petermaurer.de/nasi.php?section=witch">Witch</a>,
or <a href="http://www.proteron.com/liteswitchx/">LiteSwitchX</a></em></li><br />
<li><p><strong>Expose</strong> - My only real
complaint is labeling windows while using F9 or F10.&#160; When I have many
open windows, it&#39;s confusing fishing for the window I want.&#160; Why only
label on hover?</p><p>It&#39;s also too bad that the keys are
on the right side of the keyboard.&#160; When my hands are in power user
position, I don&#39;t like moving them.</p><em>Solution:
none</em></li><br />
<li><p><strong>Dock</strong> - Very easy way to
open apps, poor way to know which windows are open. Taskbar on Windows
is more functional.</p><em>Solution:
none</em></li><br />
<li><p><strong>Tab switching</strong> -
Keystrokes are a great idea and are very useful. But when they consist
of using 2 hands, it&#39;s not saving much time to use
them.</p><p>When used in programs with tabs such as web
browsers or text editors, it isn’t efficient. Command-#, where # is a
numerical value, is the default keystroke for tab
switching.</p><p>When you have more than four or five tabs
open at once, tab location becomes relative after the first three or
four open tabs. I just want to quickly cycle through all open
tabs.</p><p>Ctrl-tab as it functions in Windows makes this
easy because if I want to start from the end, I can use ctrl-shift-tab
and cycle backwards. This keystroke is consistent in all programs.
Command-# is too involved with many open
tabs.</p><em>Solution: none</em></li><br />
<li><p><strong>Closing Apps</strong> - Closing
an application should be as simple as closing the last open window.
Yet, I am forced to quit from an application group for each application
that I want to close.&#160; I know the shortcut Command-Q is used to perform
this action, but I am not sure why this is necessary.&#160; Getting used to
this shortcut could be disastrous if I accidentally close a window
which contained critical information and is hidden behind all the other
open windows.</p><em>Solution: <a href="http://forum.insanelymac.com/index.php?showtopic=26597">Spotlight</a>,
although it&#39;s never worked correctly for me.</em></li><br />
<li><p><strong>One-button mouse</strong> -&#160;
Apple, get over it already! OS X natively supports them, usability
vastly improves with them, and I can&#39;t live on computers without two
button mice. When is Apple finally going to stop shipping their
computers with just one button?</p><p>I dismiss the
argument of poor <a href="http://www.gearlive.com/index.php/news/article/why-apple-makes-a-one-buttoned-mouse-01280820/">&quot;technical
ability of the average computer user&quot;</a>.&#160; The average user of a
computer is becoming younger every year, and with computer courses
being taught in school, multi-button mice are ubiquitous with good user
experience.</p><p>Software that utilizes multi-button
functionality, such as any <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X_Window_System">X Window
System</a> applications, are designed with multi-button mice in
mind.&#160; This, too, is mainstream in OS X
software.</p><p>This is the main problem that bugs me about
Apple laptops.</p><em>Solution: buy a third-party
multi-button mouse (Mighty Mouse sucks) or get the new MacBook Pro with
Core 2 Duos because scrolling trackpad functionality is now included.
Right-click can also be emulated by placing two fingers on trackpad
then clicking.</em></li><br />
<li><p><strong>Delete key</strong> (the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delete_key">actual delete
key</a>, not the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Backspace_key">backspace
key</a>) - Why does the delete key, alone, not delete anything
outside of applications?&#160; For instance, when I want to delete a file
from the desktop, which is very frequent when downloading newer
versions of applications, I have to drag old files to the trash every
time or use a multi-button keystroke.</p><p>Why does the
delete key not work more intuitively? On the Apple laptop, the
counterintuitive way to use the delete key is the key sequence Fn and
the backspace key. Get rid of the useless F12 button and make that the
official delete key.</p><em>Solution: <a href="http://doublecommand.sourceforge.net/">Remap keystroke with
Doublecommand on laptop</a>. None for
desktop</em></li><br />
<li><p><strong>Home/End keys</strong> - <a href="http://evansweb.info/articles/2005/03/24/mac-os-x-and-home-end-keys">Same
complaint with these keys</a> as the delete key.&#160; I can&#39;t use the
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Home_key">home</a> or
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/End_key">end</a> keys
to consistently function the same in every
program.</p><p>If I want to go to the beginning of the
line, I use the keystroke command-left arrow.&#160; Sometimes, however, like
in text editors or chat programs, the home and end keys function more
like the Windows versions.</p><p>I don&#39;t like this
inconsistency and don&#39;t want to remember different keystrokes for every
app.&#160; What a waste of my time.</p><em>Solution: <a href="http://doublecommand.sourceforge.net/">Doublecommand
(Hallelujah!)</a></em></li><br />
<li><p><strong>Finder</strong> - Where&#39;s the
folder tree menu showing you where you are in relation to your root
drive as you <a href="http://www.xvsxp.com/files/file_browsing.php">search through
Finder</a>?&#160; Spotlight and Quicksilver are relatively quick and
easy ways to find files or applications, but sometimes I need to browse
through certain areas to reorganize files and folders. There&#39;s not an
easy way of doing this without two Finder folders
open.</p><p>I think it would also help to include an
address bar for finding local files within
Finder.</p><em>Solution: <a href="http://www.cocoatech.com/">Path
Finder</a></em></li><br />
<li><p><strong>Software Installation</strong> -
Why must I drag installation files into the Applications folder?&#160;
Wizards are so much easier to use and it&#39;s more
linear.</p><p>On a Windows computer, I click on the
executable file and everything is self-contained. The inconsistent way
that some files create a &quot;virtual drive&quot; that unloads to the desktop
and others don&#39;t adds to the confusion.</p><p>Another
installation problem:&#160; you get few options while installing an
application.&#160; It&#39;s not obvious that you install applications in folders
other than the Applications folder.&#160; With extra products such as iTunes
with Quicktime, I am forced to install most of the included software.&#160;
I can&#39;t install iTunes without Quicktime.</p><p>What about
software from Macromedia, Microsoft, or even OpenOffice, all of which
usually bundle many applications into one executable file? There’s no
easy wizard to let me choose how to install these
programs.</p><p>Not only is installing applications
nonlinear but after a program is installed, there is no immediate way
to access what I just installed unless I go into the Applications
folder.&#160; Why isn&#39;t there an easy way to find a list of recently
installed programs?&#160; The only solution I know is to drag the icon to
the dock. After using the new app for the first time, before dragging
that icon into the dock, it will disappear forcing me to go back to the
Applications folder to redrag icon into the
dock.</p><p>Former Windows users quite often leave the dmg
files and mounted drives on the desktop thinking that the software is
installed.&#160; This can clutter up the desktop and confuse people why
software isn&#39;t working.</p><em>Soution:
none</em></li><br />
<li><p><strong>Help</strong> - This brings back
the Focus problems: Help opens in different focus from the software you
are using.&#160; If you use Help in applications on Windows, it doesn&#39;t lose
focus of that app while using Help. It wastes time to switch between
apps in OS X when using Help.</p><em>Solution:
none</em></li><br />
<li><p><strong>Dropdown Menus</strong> - If you
open a dropdown menu and click a grayed out selection, the dropdown
menu disappears.&#160; If I misclick a menu selection item, it annoys me
that I have to reopen the whole menu to get back right where I was
before the misclick.</p><em>Solution:
none</em></li><br />
<li><p><strong>Spotlight</strong> - It is
slower in its search than <a href="http://www.x1.com/products/index.html?source=YDS">X1</a>,
a comparable Windows search app.&#160; Bringing up lists shouldn&#39;t take so
long.</p><em>Solution: <a href="http://quicksilver.blacktree.com/">Quicksilver</a> for
applications and Spotlight for files</em></li><br />
</ol><p>
</p><p>
The user interface should be intuitively functional out of the box. OS
X is inconsistent in many areas which slows down the speed at which I
use my Mac. Even after almost 9 months of using OS X, I&#39;m still
frequently annoyed by the UI and its frustrating problems.&#160; Luckily,
building modules for the UI can be simple.
</p><p>
Clearly, this is presented with a Windows bias. With Windows, almost
all buttons have obvious and consistent functions especially Home, End,
and Delete.&#160; Of course, going into different applications and games
will cause keys to behave differently even in Windows, but OS X should
not have such differing functionality across the OS.&#160; I also enjoy the
GUI eye candy of OS X, but I think that sometimes this candy makes the
OS harder to use.
</p><p>
Each OS has its quirks that make it difficult to use.&#160; I find better
consistency in Windows as well as better features to use, such as
resizing windows or quickly switching to different windows, make an
operating system much eaiser to use in the long run.
</p><p>
The argument can be made that using either Windows or OS X is like
driving two different cars.&#160; The core functionality is the same; both
have engines under the hood, you have an acceleration pedal to create
momentum and a break pedal to create friction.&#160; It&#39;s just getting used
to the little quirks about each that make them more usable.
</p><p>
The operating system should always work for you and not the other way
around.&#160; I don&#39;t find that Mac functionality is always better than
Windows and vice versa.&#160; I also don&#39;t find it compelling enough to
completely switch from Windows to OS X (this is besides the fact that
most software is developed for Windows anyway). Regardless, I
understand the hardcore Apple enthusiasts and how set they are in their
ways just as much as Windows enthusiasts are.&#160; To each, his own I
suppose.<br />
 </p>   <p style="clear:both;"> 
    <a href="http://asuh.vox.com/library/post/os-x-annoyances.html?_c=feed-atom-full#comments">Read and post comments</a>   |   
    <a href="http://www.vox.com/share/6a00cdf3a85ed0cb8f00d09e4b25f4be2b?_c=feed-atom-full">Send to a friend</a> 
</p>

                </div>
            ]]>
        </content> 
    <category term="digg mac osx windows annoyances os" scheme="http://asuh.vox.com/tags/digg+mac+osx+windows+annoyances+os/" label="digg mac osx windows annoyances os" /> 
    </entry> 
</feed>


